Is this the same as the sixteen-type test everyone posts?

No, and deliberately not. Those assign you to one of sixteen categories. This measures five continuous traits and reports where you landed on each, with the reliability of each scale attached. Different model, different output, and no borrowed branding.

Why are the questions in English even on other language versions?

Because a translated item is not the item that was validated. Translation shifts meaning, and the reliability figures shown here were measured on the English wording. Non-English pages show a reference translation underneath, but scoring uses the original.

Only twenty questions — can that be accurate?

It is a short form, and it says so. The published reliabilities range from 0.65 to 0.77, which is respectable for twenty items and well short of a clinical instrument. Treat it as a sketch you could redo in three minutes, not a diagnosis.

Do you keep my answers?

No. There is no account, no upload, no autosave. Everything is computed in the page and disappears when you close the tab.

Why show reliability at all? Nobody else does.

Because it changes how you should read the result. The openness scale here is the noisiest of the five; if your number there surprises you, that is the first thing worth knowing. Hiding it would make the page look more authoritative and be less useful.

全部工具

§ 工具 · 大五人格,20 题

五个维度。不发四个字母。

大多数人格测试给你一个标签,因为标签好分享。这个给你五个数字、它问过的每一道题的原文,以及每个量表实际有多可靠。大约三分钟。

按每句话描述你的准确程度打分 —— 按你平常的样子,不是你希望的样子。

1Am the life of the party.
我是聚会上的活跃分子。
2Sympathize with others' feelings.
我能与别人的感受产生共鸣。
3Get chores done right away.
该做的事我会马上做完。
4Have frequent mood swings.
我情绪起伏频繁。
5Have a vivid imagination.
我想象力丰富。
6Talk to a lot of different people at parties.
在聚会上我会和很多不同的人聊天。
7Feel others' emotions.
我能感受到别人的情绪。
8Like order.
我喜欢有条理。
9Get upset easily.
我容易心烦。
10Have difficulty understanding abstract ideas.
我难以理解抽象的概念。
11Don't talk a lot.
我话不多。
12Am not really interested in others.
我对别人其实没什么兴趣。
13Often forget to put things back in their proper place.
我常忘记把东西放回原处。
14Am relaxed most of the time.
我大部分时候是放松的。
15Am not interested in abstract ideas.
我对抽象的想法不感兴趣。
16Keep in the background.
我倾向待在人群的边缘。
17Am not interested in other people's problems.
我对别人的烦恼不感兴趣。
18Make a mess of things.
我常把事情弄得一团糟。
19Seldom feel blue.
我很少感到低落。
20Do not have a good imagination.
我的想象力不好。

🔴 题目以英文原文计分。下方中文仅供理解 —— 翻译过的题目已经不是被验证过的那道题,上面的信度数字是在英文措辞上测出来的。

你的五个数字

已答 0/20

一个维度要四道题全答完才给分 —— 只答一部分算出来的均分看起来像分数,但它不是。

Extraversion—信度 α 0.77
Agreeableness—信度 α 0.70
Conscientiousness—信度 α 0.69
Emotional volatility—信度 α 0.68
Openness to ideas—信度 α 0.65

α 是内部一致性,由量表作者报告。0.65 的维度和 0.77 的维度**不该用同样的信心去读** —— 前者噪声更大,所以我们把它显示出来,而不是藏起来。

这些不是百分位。我们没有常模样本,所以不能诚实地告诉你「你比 73% 的人更外向」。这个数字只说明你在这把 1–5 的尺子上落在哪儿。

为什么这里没有四个字母的类型

因为证据不支持。这五个特质是连续的 —— 切成类别会让 2.9 和 3.1 变成「两种人」,并递给你一个感觉像解释的标签。数字更不好分享,但更接近真的。

这些题目从哪来

二十句全部是 Mini-IPIP 的原题,逐字取自 International Personality Item Pool —— 一个公共领域的研究资源,其题目明确允许自由使用,含商业用途。题不是我们写的,也没有被我们改写:改写一道题就等于换了一道题,上面那些信度数字就不再适用于它。

Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. Items via ipip.ori.org.

常见问题

Is this the same as the sixteen-type test everyone posts?: No, and deliberately not. Those assign you to one of sixteen categories. This measures five continuous traits and reports where you landed on each, with the reliability of each scale attached. Different model, different output, and no borrowed branding.
Why are the questions in English even on other language versions?: Because a translated item is not the item that was validated. Translation shifts meaning, and the reliability figures shown here were measured on the English wording. Non-English pages show a reference translation underneath, but scoring uses the original.
Only twenty questions — can that be accurate?: It is a short form, and it says so. The published reliabilities range from 0.65 to 0.77, which is respectable for twenty items and well short of a clinical instrument. Treat it as a sketch you could redo in three minutes, not a diagnosis.
Do you keep my answers?: No. There is no account, no upload, no autosave. Everything is computed in the page and disappears when you close the tab.
Why show reliability at all? Nobody else does.: Because it changes how you should read the result. The openness scale here is the noisiest of the five; if your number there surprises you, that is the first thing worth knowing. Hiding it would make the page look more authoritative and be less useful.