§ Ferramentas · Cinco Grandes, 20 itens
Cinco dimensões. Sem tipo de quatro letras.
A maioria dos testes entrega um rótulo porque rótulo se compartilha. Este entrega cinco números, o texto exato de cada pergunta e o quanto cada escala é confiável. Cerca de três minutos.
Avalie o quanto cada frase te descreve — como você costuma ser, não como gostaria de ser.
- 1Am the life of the party.
Sou a alma da festa.
- 2Sympathize with others' feelings.
Compreendo os sentimentos dos outros.
- 3Get chores done right away.
Faço as tarefas imediatamente.
- 4Have frequent mood swings.
Tenho oscilações de humor frequentes.
- 5Have a vivid imagination.
Tenho uma imaginação viva.
- 6Talk to a lot of different people at parties.
Converso com muita gente diferente nas festas.
- 7Feel others' emotions.
Sinto as emoções dos outros.
- 8Like order.
Gosto de ordem.
- 9Get upset easily.
Fico chateado com facilidade.
- 10Have difficulty understanding abstract ideas.
Tenho dificuldade em entender ideias abstratas.
- 11Don't talk a lot.
Não falo muito.
- 12Am not really interested in others.
Não tenho muito interesse pelos outros.
- 13Often forget to put things back in their proper place.
Costumo esquecer de colocar as coisas no lugar.
- 14Am relaxed most of the time.
Fico relaxado na maior parte do tempo.
- 15Am not interested in abstract ideas.
Não me interesso por ideias abstratas.
- 16Keep in the background.
Fico em segundo plano.
- 17Am not interested in other people's problems.
Não me interesso pelos problemas dos outros.
- 18Make a mess of things.
Costumo bagunçar as coisas.
- 19Seldom feel blue.
Raramente me sinto para baixo.
- 20Do not have a good imagination.
Não tenho boa imaginação.
🔴 A pontuação usa o texto original em inglês. A tradução é apenas de apoio: um item traduzido já não é o item validado, e as confiabilidades acima foram medidas na redação inglesa.
Seus cinco números
0 de 20 respondidas
A dimension only gets a score once all four of its items are answered — a partial average would look like a score without being one.
- Extraversion—reliability α 0.77
- Agreeableness—reliability α 0.70
- Conscientiousness—reliability α 0.69
- Emotional volatility—reliability α 0.68
- Openness to ideas—reliability α 0.65
α is internal consistency, reported by the scale’s authors. A dimension at 0.65 and one at 0.77 should not be read with equal confidence — the lower one is noisier, which is why we show it instead of hiding it.
These are not percentiles. We have no norming sample, so we cannot honestly tell you that you are “more extraverted than 73% of people”. All the number says is where you landed on a 1–5 scale.
Why there is no four-letter type here
Because the evidence does not support one. These five traits are continuous — cutting them into categories turns 2.9 and 3.1 into “two kinds of people”, and hands you a label that feels like an explanation. The numbers are less shareable and more true.
Where these questions come from
All twenty statements are the Mini-IPIP items, reproduced word for word from the International Personality Item Pool — a public-domain research resource whose items are explicitly free to use, including commercially. We did not write them, and we did not reword them: rewording an item makes it a different item, and the reliability figures above would no longer apply to it.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. Items via ipip.ori.org.
Questions people ask
- Is this the same as the sixteen-type test everyone posts?
- No, and deliberately not. Those assign you to one of sixteen categories. This measures five continuous traits and reports where you landed on each, with the reliability of each scale attached. Different model, different output, and no borrowed branding.
- Why are the questions in English even on other language versions?
- Because a translated item is not the item that was validated. Translation shifts meaning, and the reliability figures shown here were measured on the English wording. Non-English pages show a reference translation underneath, but scoring uses the original.
- Only twenty questions — can that be accurate?
- It is a short form, and it says so. The published reliabilities range from 0.65 to 0.77, which is respectable for twenty items and well short of a clinical instrument. Treat it as a sketch you could redo in three minutes, not a diagnosis.
- Do you keep my answers?
- No. There is no account, no upload, no autosave. Everything is computed in the page and disappears when you close the tab.
- Why show reliability at all? Nobody else does.
- Because it changes how you should read the result. The openness scale here is the noisiest of the five; if your number there surprises you, that is the first thing worth knowing. Hiding it would make the page look more authoritative and be less useful.